SAMPLE DOSSIER · Vũng Tàu · real survey data · competitor performance ranges withheldGet one for your address →
PLACEREAD
SITE EVALUATION REPORT
Confidential · Prepared for the operating partner

Bãi Sau Grid Candidate
Vũng Tàu — Back Beach hinterland

A full-stack read of one address: who is around it, who passes it, who competes with it, what it can earn — and exactly what must be verified before a lease is signed.
Verdict
CONDITIONAL
4 conditions precedent — p.2
Location Score
5.2/10
all four factors · p.3
Data completeness
5/6 layers
camera count pending — declared, p.5
REF LI-VT-2608 · 26 AUG 2026 SURVEYED CATCHMENT: 254 VENUES & ANCHORS · 67 WITHIN 900 M PAGE 1 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · THE SITE
Section 1 · The site, in thirty seconds

C12 Phan Huy Chú — 180 m² on the grid's own connector.

The unit · field photo

FIELD PHOTO
frontage · interior · street view — from the site visit file
Shell condition at visit: nhà cấp 4, open-plan ground floor — full fit-out required (Section 9).

Fact sheet MEASURED / LISTED

AddressC12 Phan Huy Chú, Bãi Sau grid
Floor area · frontage180 m² · 12 m frontage
Capacity as planned80 covers indoor
Streettwo-way connector ✓ · flow 8/10
Asking rent18M ₫/mo · 100k/m²
Beach access250 m · flat walk, no crossing
Hotel block10 boutique properties ≤250 m
Melody condo cluster≈290 m · ~4 min walk

Locator

Why this address entered the pipeline: it matches the "second line" principle — a two-way connector one block behind a demand mass, priced at neighbourhood rent while intercepting hotel-block and condo traffic. At 100k ₫/m² it is one of the best rent-to-catchment ratios surveyed in Vũng Tàu this quarter.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationUnit data from listing & site visit · verify at contract2 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · EXECUTIVE VERDICT
Section 2 · Executive verdict

Works as a dinner-led neighbourhood flagship —
if four things hold.

The site sits on a genuine two-way connector inside the Back Beach residential grid — hotel guests on one side, the Melody condo base on the other, and the nearest direct rival 650 m away. What tempers the verdict is not demand but verification: two of the four load-bearing facts are still field-pending. Hence: conditional, not enthusiastic-yet.

How the verdict was reached — the reasoning, step by step

1Demand exists and is captive. 10 boutique hotels ≤250 m + the Melody cluster at 290 m MEASURED → two independent demand engines, both passing the frontage.
2The street delivers it. Two-way connector, flow 8/10, evening peak 100% MEASURED → the demand doesn't need to be pulled; it walks past.
3Nobody serves it at this tier. 12 direct rivals mapped; nearest 650 m, all beach-head or centre MEASURED → the gap is spatial and real.
4But two facts are still assumptions. Real traffic volume (camera) and the hotel-tier split are FIELD-PENDING — and both can flip the economics.
5And the calendar bites. A 62% weekend city with a Sep–Nov trough demands the rent ceiling and the cash cushion. → CONDITIONAL: yes, if C1–C4 hold.
Score
5.2/10
top 30% of VT sites read
Revenue scenarios MODELED
220–520M₫/mo
realistic 350M · menu-based
Rent ratio @18M
5.1%
8.2% even in the conservative case
Weekend share
62%
Fri–Sun carries the week
Cash cushion
3.5mo
of fixed costs, minimum

Why it can work — the three drivers that matter

1True two-way connector. Street flow 8/10 MEASURED — residents cut through daily; evening index peaks at 100% of daily traffic.
2A weekday floor exists. 31% residential + 15% business density within reach — rare in a weekend city, and the difference between surviving Tuesday and not.
3The core ring is unclaimed. 12 direct rivals mapped within 2.1 km MEASURED — but the nearest sits 650 m south at the beach head. Inside the hotel block the site commands, nobody serves this tier.

What must hold — conditions precedent

C1Traffic verification. Camera count Tue 12–13 & 19–20 ≥ 300 vehicles/h VERIFY. Below 250 → walk away.
C2Hotel tier check. Budget beds (nhà nghỉ) ≤ 60% of rooms within 400 m VERIFY — the spend tier depends on it.
C3Rent ceiling 22M ₫/mo. Above it, the low season stops covering fixed costs in the conservative case.
C4Motorbike frontage. ≥ 5 m usable frontage with parking — evening trade here arrives on two wheels.
Bottom line for the decision-maker: proceed to lease negotiation now, run C1–C2 in the same week, and sign only under 22M with the terrace confirmed. Every number behind this page is sourced and graded on p.6.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationEstimates are online-signal based, pending operator P&L3 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · SCORECARD
Section 3 · Why this score

5.2 / 10 — built from four measured factors, not an opinion.

The score is multiplicative: a great street cannot rescue an empty catchment, and vice versa. Each factor below is benchmarked against every site we have read in Vũng Tàu — the grey band is the city median.

Score construction · waterfall

5.5 CATCHMENT ×0.96 STREET FLOW 8/10 ×0.98 ACCESSIBILITY 8/10 ×1.00 COMPETITION → → → 5.2 FINAL

Factor benchmarks vs Vũng Tàu median — grey tick = city median site

Factorvs cityStructural note — what to do with it
Catchment 5.5 MEASURED Above the city median but below the Front-Beach triangle. 67 venues & anchors within 900 m carry the score — the wider 254 is city context, declared apart. Solid for a neighbourhood flagship; do not price it like a tourist flagship.
Street 8/10 MEASURED Top-15% street in the city: two-way, grid-dense, evening-alive. The engine reading was cross-checked by an independent visual pass — the two agreed within one point. Highest-confidence factor in this report.
Access 8/10 MEASURED Highly connected; 4 anchors sit behind a barrier and were discounted, costing 0.02. Irrelevant for dinner trade, mildly relevant for lunch delivery radius.
Competition ×1.0 MEASURED 422 venues mapped, 12 direct — none inside the primary 400 m ring (nearest: 650 m). The factor holds at ×1.00 by construction; the contested beach head 700 m south is analysed on p.7.
Structural read: the score is street-led, catchment-checked. That combination suits a destination-worthy neighbourhood concept — not an impulse tourist trap. Position and market accordingly.
Upside path: the score is capped by what is unverified, not by what was found. Camera count ≥400 v/h lifts street to 9/10; a clean hotel-tier walk removes the catchment discount — verified C1–C2 re-score the site in the 5.8–6.2 band. The conditions are not hurdles; they are the score's own headroom.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationBenchmarks computed on all Vũng Tàu sites surveyed to date4 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · CATCHMENT
Section 4 · Who actually pays here

A resident-anchored catchment with a tourist topping — not the reverse.

Demand mix · 254 venues & anchors MEASURED

🏠 Residential (80+)31%
🏨 Hospitality (46)18%
🛍 Retail (46)18%
🎓 Education (39)15%
💼 Business (37)15%
Local truth: 67 of 254 within 900 m — the number that describes this address; the rest is city context, weighted down accordingly. "+" marks a count that hit the survey ceiling: a floor, not a total.

Traffic by time of day MEASURED · service implications

Morning 69% Lunch 52% Aft. 89% Evening 100% PEAK
Dinner-led, breakfast-viable. Build the P&L on the 18–23 window; capture mornings with a lean coffee-pastry format, skip the structural lunch push.

Hospitality tier pyramid · the spend-tier test FIELD-VERIFY

Boutique / 4★+ · 13 3★ & serviced · 16 Budget / nhà nghỉ · 17+ Budget share ≈ 37–45% — inside tolerance, near the 60% red line. Split modeled from listings; count on foot before signing (condition C2).

Customer segments · ranked by reachable spend

SegmentWhy it ranks
1Resident families & professionalsThe weekday floor. Grid-dense housing behind the frontage; dinner + weekend family lunch.
2Domestic weekend tourists (3★+)62% of the week's revenue arrives Fri–Sun; mid-tier hotels within walking range.
3Delivery radius (res + hotel)High-connectivity grid → strong delivery economics off-peak.
✕Budget beach walk-insPresent but wrong tier — do not shape the menu around them.
Market gap: 422 F&B venues mapped, zero in the quality-casual dinner tier this catchment can support. The gap is real; the ceiling on it is the hotel-tier verification above.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationCounts within 900 m unless stated · survey 24–26 Aug 20265 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · THE GROUND
Section 5 · The ground, mapped — 254 surveyed points, plotted as surveyed

The site sits inside a hotel block, on the grid's own street.

City overview · where this address sits in Vũng Tàu

🟢 candidate (Phan Huy Chú, Bãi Sau grid) · the two demand masses: Front Beach centre (NW) and Back Beach strip (E) · © OpenStreetMap

Walking catchment · every surveyed point MEASURED

rings 400 / 900 m · ● residential ● hospitality ● retail & lifestyle ● education ● business

Competitive field · 12 direct, plotted where they are MEASURED

🔴 direct (Italian / pizza-led, same wallet) · 🟠 indirect (hotel dining & upscale) · labels on the four inside 1.3 km
Spatial read: the direct ring clusters at the beach head 650–750 m south (Luca, Momma Roza's) and in the centre 1.3 km west (David). The hotel block around the site — 10 boutique properties within 250 m — is served by none of them. The map is the pitch.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationAll points from the survey of 24 Aug 2026 — no illustrative markers6 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · INTERCEPT REGISTER
Section 6 · What the address intercepts — named, measured, on foot

10 hotels within 250 m. The frontage is on their way to the beach.

Every entry below is a surveyed point with its real walking distance. "Intercept" is the operative question: does this demand pass the door, or must it be pulled?

🏨 Hospitality · 24 within 900 m — the nearest twelve

PropertyWalkTier
Seven Stars Hotel65 mboutique
Queen Garden Hotel71 mboutique
Mi Lan Diamond Hotel74 mboutique
Sun Beach Hotel82 mboutique
Milan Corner Hotel91 mboutique
126 Villa & Homestay116 mvilla
La Casa Hotel · V Boutique121 mboutique ×2
Joi Hotel — Anthony163 mboutique
Hese Boutique & Apartment241 mboutique
Green LP Hotel & Apartment347 m3★ mid
Aries Boutique Hotel598 mboutique
Intercept: the site is INSIDE the hotel block, not near it. Guests walking to the beach (250 m SE) pass the frontage twice a day — breakfast and dinner capture without a marketing dong.

🏠 Residential · 30 within 900 m — the weekday base

ClusterWalkType
Đông Vui Homestay block40 mupper apt.
Ula Apartment105 mupper apt.
BH Residence Inn228 mluxury
Joi Home — The Hidden Villa260 mluxury villa
Melody Vũng Tàu towers (multiple blocks)≈290 mcondo cluster
Khu phố 4–5 shophouse grid0–400 mstreet housing
Intercept: the Melody condo cluster — the largest residential mass of the Back Beach — is a 4-minute flat walk with no road to cross. That is the Tuesday-night dinner base, and the delivery core.

🛍 Retail & daily anchors · what makes the street lived-in

Linh Trần Beauty Center177 m
VNVC vaccination centre (daily family traffic)320 m
HASAKI Vietnam flagship323 m
Aroma Center · Thuy Beauty327–391 m
Piggyland Kidzone & Coffee348 m
Đình Thắng Tam temple (festival days)377 m
CGV Lam Sơn Square (city gravity, pre/post-movie)1.66 km

💼 Weekday economy & 🎓 family signals — honest read

Khang Chính & An Law offices285 m
MSB bank branch995 m
Vietcombank1.38 km
PetroVietnam Tower · V-Office1.8–1.9 km
Apple Tree Kindergarten413 m
Sunshine Kindergarten1.1 km
Honest intercept: the office mass sits 1.8 km away — structural business lunch is NOT this site's game. Weekdays are carried by residents and in-house hotel guests; the kindergartens signal the family-dinner segment the grid already houses.
Ring summary MEASURED: ≤250 m — 10 hospitality · 5 residential · 1 retail  |  ≤500 m — 11 · 19 · 7 + 2 offices + 1 school  |  ≤900 m — 24 · 30 · 7 + 3 business + 1 school. The demand gradient points INWARD: this address is the centre of its own market, not the edge of someone else's.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationDistances are straight-line walking approximations from the survey7 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · COMPETITION
Section 7 · Competition that matters

422 venues mapped. Twelve share the wallet — four within a 13-minute walk.

Tiering is concept-relative: a phở counter is not a rival to a quality-casual Italian dinner house. The engine finds 12 direct rivals in 2.1 km — every one plotted on p.5 exactly where it trades. Revenue figures are engine estimates from public signals: labelled, banded, honest about confidence. They size the prize; they are not to be quoted as fact.

The relevant set · the four inside the walk radius — 8 more direct at 1.1–2.1 km listed in the annex

VenueTierDist.Public signalsEst. revenue ₫/mo MODELED
🔒 WITHHELD IN PUBLIC COPY
Read & takeaway
Luca Pizza & Italian
beach head, south
DIRECT 672 m 4.7★ 250M – 450M
confidence: partialon request
The real rival: same wallet, highest rating in the ring. Wins on beach proximity; blind to the hotel block and the Melody base. Differentiate on residents + table service, never on price.
Momma Roza’s Pizza
beach head, south
DIRECT 721 m 4.6★ 150M – 300M
confidence: partialon request
Confirms the southern cluster: two quality pizza-led venues 50 m apart fighting for the same beach flow. Their war is not on your street.
Good Morning Vietnam
Back Beach mid
DIRECT 649 m 4.1★ 150M – 300M
confidence: thinon request
The veteran Italian franchise — proves longevity is possible here, but its rating gap (4.1 vs the ring's 4.6+) is the opening: the market rewards better execution.
David Pizzeria
city centre, west
DIRECT 1.28 km 4.3★ 400M – 800M
confidence: partialon request
The institution — legitimises Italian city-wide and anchors the centre. Different territory, different customer path: benchmark, not battlefield.

Positioning map · price tier vs public rating (bubble = review volume)

PRICE TIER → RATING → David 4.3★ Luca 4.7★ M.Roza 4.6★ GMV 4.1★ casual layer THE GAP ↑
The open box: mid-premium check at 4.6★+ execution, INSIDE the residential grid. Luca holds the rating but not the ground; David holds the ground (centre) but not the tier.

Closure intelligence · churn of the zone MEASURED

4.1%
12-mo closure rate,
this grid
9.8%
seafront strip,
same period
The residential grid kills fewer restaurants than the tourist strip — less footfall, more loyalty. Failures here cluster on lanes with no evening traffic; this street is not one of them.
Competitive verdict: enter as the neighbourhood's quality dinner house. Luca proves the wallet exists 700 m away at 4.7★; GMV proves longevity at 4.1★; David legitimises the cuisine city-wide. Nobody serves the hotel block and the Melody base — the ground this site stands on.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationCompetitor estimates: public-signal engine, bands pending real data8 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · ECONOMICS
Section 8 · Can it pay for itself

A weekend city: the year is won in June–August and defended in autumn.

Vũng Tàu seasonality · monthly revenue index CALIBRATED PROFILE — shaded = below break-even in the LOW scenario

1.00 J F M A M J J A S O N D SEP–NOV: rainy weekdays — the survival window C3 protects

Revenue scenarios · menu-based MODELED · pending P&L

ConservativeRealisticOptimistic
Covers / day223552
Revenue ₫/mo220M350M520M
Rent ratio @18M8.2%5.1%3.5%
Rent ratio @25M11.4%7.1%4.8%
Occupancy implied (80 covers)28%44%65% w/ turns
Check of 330k ₫ built from the operating menu card (build-up on p.11), Vũng Tàu-adjusted. Fixed costs are covered from ≈14 covers/day; the conservative case is intentionally set near all-in break-even.

Risk register · severity × evidence

RiskMitigation
Sunday-evening exodus — the HCMC drive-home empties dinner service weekly.Sunday lunch push; resident loyalty program for weekdays.
Hotel tier drift — budget infill would erode the reachable spend tier over 2–3 years.Re-survey annually; C2 sets the entry bar.
Seasonal cash trough Sep–Nov.3.5-month cushion; staff flexibility clause.
No red flags found — flooding, legal and access screens came back clean at survey level.Standard due diligence still applies.
Negotiation lever, in one line: at 18M the site survives its own worst season in the LOW scenario. Every million above 22M transfers that safety margin from you to the landlord.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationScenario maths available as a working annex on request9 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · INVESTMENT
Section 9 · What it costs to enter

Funding need: 1.6 – 2.3B ₫ all-in — fit-out is only 60% of it.

Bands, not quotes: fit-out prices in Vũng Tàu move with contractor and finish level, and the range below is calibrated on comparable 160–200 m² quality-casual builds. The two lines most investors forget — working capital and contingency — are in the stack, on purpose.

CAPEX build-up · 180 m² unit MODELED

ItemLow ₫High ₫Note
Fit-out & MEP (civil, AC, hood, electrics)550M850Mnhà cấp 4 shell assumed — survey the slab first
Kitchen equipment280M420Mpizza oven + hot line, single-kitchen layout
FF&E — furniture, tableware, lighting180M280M85–95 covers incl. terrace
Facade, signage, terrace works40M80Mcondition C4 drives this line
Pre-opening — hiring, training, stock, launch120M180M6-week runway
Deposit (3 mo) + key money54M150Mkey money 0–100M — negotiable in this grid
Contingency 10%120M195Mnon-optional in VN builds
CAPEX subtotal1.34B2.16B
+ Working capital (3.5 mo fixed costs)300M350Mthe Sep–Nov survival reserve — p.7

Funding stack · where the money sits

Working capital300–350M · untouchable Contingency 120–195M Deposit & pre-opening Equipment & FF&E Fit-out & MEP 1.64B mid case band 1.6–2.3B
Structural note: the deal lives or dies on the fit-out line — a landlord contribution or rent-free period of 2–3 months moves payback by a full quarter. Ask for it: this grid has vacancy.
All CAPEX figures are pre-quote planning bands for a quality-casual concept at this size. A contractor bill of quantities replaces this page in the funding memo — the structure stays, the numbers harden.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationBands calibrated on comparable 160–200 m² builds, 2025–2610 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · P&L & PAYBACK
Section 10 · When it pays back

Realistic case: ~29% operating margin, payback inside 18 months.

The check is not an assumption — it is built from the operating menu card, adjusted −10% for Vũng Tàu pricing. Three self-consistent monthly P&Ls follow; labor is semi-fixed, rent locked at the 18M benchmark (why C3 caps it at 22M).

Average check build-up · from the menu card MENU-BASED

CourseCard price bandOrder incidenceContribution
Antipasti & starters85k – 135k35%38k
Fresh pasta mains150k – 205k60%107k
Pizza140k – 195k35%59k
Dessert60k – 80k30%21k
Beverage (wine-led evenings)45k – 220k90%105k
weighted average check per cover →≈ 330k ₫

Monthly P&L · three scenarios MODELED

ConservativeRealisticOptimistic
Revenue (covers × 330k)220M350M520M
Food & beverage cost (30%)−66M−105M−156M
Labor (semi-fixed)−58M−66M−78M
Rent (benchmark 18M)−18M−18M−18M
Utilities, supplies, maintenance−26M−33M−42M
Marketing, delivery & G&A−12M−28M−48M
Operating profit+40M+100M+178M
Margin18%29%34%

Payback on 1.64B funding · menu-based scenarios

~41 mo
conservative — what
C1–C3 exist to prevent
~17 mo
realistic · seasonality-adjusted
~10 mo
optimistic
SensitivityEffect on mid payback
Rent 18M → 25M+3 months · margin 27% → 24%
Opening in April (rides Jun–Aug peak)−2 months vs a September opening
2 months rent-free from landlord−1.5 months + 36M off funding
Check +10% (330k → 363k)−4 months — the strongest lever on the table

Cumulative cash position · months 0–36 · seasonality applied MODELED

0 −1.6B m10 m17 conservative — crosses ≈ m41, off-chart openm12m24m36
The financial verdict in one line: at 18M rent the realistic case returns the capital in ~17 months with the seasonal trough priced in; the conservative case is the reason the four conditions on p.3 are conditions, not suggestions.
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationFull 5-year model available as a working annex11 / 12
PLACEREAD
LI-VT-2608 · ACTION & METHOD
Section 11 · Before you sign

Six field checks. Each has a threshold — not a feeling.

CheckPass thresholdWhen
☐Camera traffic count — fixed hour, both directions≥ 300 vehicles/h Tue 12–13 & 19–20this week
☐Hotel tier walk — count beds by tier, 400 m radiusbudget share ≤ 60%same visit
☐Sunday 17–19 exodus watchevening covers projection ≥ 60% of Saturdaynext weekend
☐Rain-day drainage checkno standing water at frontage after 30 min rainfirst rain
☐Frontage & moto parking measure≥ 5 m usable + 8 bikes off-carriagewaysite visit
☐Landlord terms sheet — term, increase, exit≥ 3+2 yrs · ≤ 8%/yr · exit clausebefore deposit
Section 12 · Method & data provenance

Every layer, graded

Catchment census (254 venues & anchors)MEASURED 24 Aug
Street network & flow modelMEASURED 24 Aug
Competitive ring (422 venues, 0 direct)MEASURED 24 Aug
Seasonality profile (city-calibrated)CALIBRATED
Revenue & rent scenariosMODELED
Traffic count · hotel tier splitFIELD-VERIFY pending

How to read this report

Nothing here is asserted beyond its evidence. MEASURED layers come from systematic multi-source surveys of the ground; MODELED figures are honest ranges from public signals, labelled until real operator numbers replace them; FIELD-VERIFY items are the report telling you where its own knowledge ends.

The day store-level figures enter the model, every band on these pages narrows into a calibrated forecast — that is the designed second stage of this analysis, not a limitation of the first.
Prepared by PlaceRead · Location Intelligence
Ho Chi Minh City · Site Evaluation Practice · REF LI-VT-2608
CONDITIONAL — 4 CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
PlaceRead · Site EvaluationConfidential — prepared for the recipient only12 / 12